Considering Asbury Park schools have failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for the fifth year under the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandate and as a result run the risk of major restructuring, it seems an appropriate time to take a critical look at NCLB and its impact on at-risk youth.
Luckily my partner Amy just wrote a graduate school paper on that exact topic. The whole paper is available here (with references included, I removed them below for ease of reading), but I will break it down into digestible parts in this post.
After extensive research, Amy’s take home point is that NCLB is designed and implemented in a way that has a significant negative impact on the population it is designed to help, at-risk students. Not only does NCLB lack guidance on how to help failing children and schools, it shines a very bright light on the populations that are failing. With no additional resources or guidance on how to raise the achievement of these populations, the easiest way for schools to improve test scores is to remove these students from their rolls. The result is the dropout crisis that plagues Asbury Park and other US inner city schools.
Perhaps most disturbing, the federal policy ignores the real problems that cause the achievement gap – unemployment, unsafe communities, insecure housing, poor health care and nutrition, lack of public transportation – while scapegoating the schools. Reformers claim, if we could just fix the schools, everything would be alright. It seems clear that the reverse is true.
Continue reading